One Small Step for Immigration, One Giant Leap for DREAMers

By -
In a stunning turn of events, the Obama administration has announced its intention to grant deferred action to many individuals brought to the United States as children, known by many as DREAMers because of their potential eligibility in the event the federal DREAM Act were ever to be passed.
Deferred action is a a choice on the part of the government to delay the removal of an individual. It is a form of prosecutorial discretion, and does not confer lawful immigration status, at least not in the same sense as lawful permanent residence, citizenship, temporary protected status, etc.
Individuals receiving deferred action are eligible to receive employment authorization valid for the period of deferred action, which in this case is two years.
In a memo released today, and accessible here, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) established the following criteria for any individuals who consider applying:
  1. The individual must have come to the U.S. prior to turning 16 years old;
  2. The individual must have continuously resided in the U.S. for at least five (5) years before today, June 15, 2012;
  3. The individual must be in the U.S. today, the date of the announcement;
  4. The individual is currently in school, has graduated from high school, has obtained a GED, or is an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States;
  5. The individual has not been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanor offense, multiple misdemeanor offenses, or otherwise poses a threat to national security or public safety; and
  6. The individual is not over the age of thirty.
The new policy seems to apply both to individuals who are currently in removal proceedings as well as those who are not. Individuals would be able to apply for the relief, although the exact process one would have to go through is still uncertain. DHS has stated a goal of establishing the policy within the next sixty (60) days.
I am cautiously optimistic about this whole program. There are a number of reasons to be suspicious. This is still the administration responsible for deporting more people than any other in history, more than one million in its first three years with a goal of 400,000 for this year.
Other attempts by this administration to introduce more prosecutorial discretion into the immigration enforcement process over the last year have been slow to implement and have brought about mixed results.
Another somewhat concerning fact is that almost as soon as the policy was announced, government officials were out and about declaring that this is not amnesty, and that everything would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, indicating a large degree of discretion on the part of government officials reviewing the applications.
Another point of concern is what happens if a new president takes office and then revokes this policy? Now everyone who has taken advantage of it is in a vulnerable position with the government knowing who they are and where they live.
Truth be told, this is no path to citizenship. It's not even a path to legal permanent residency. There is nothing beneficiaries can do to extend this benefit to their family members who do not qualify and who are still possibly subject to deportation.
Still, the constant fear of being deported at any moment that so many hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions, of individuals live every day may very well be done away with by today's announcement.
Individuals who have been unable to work, obtain a driver's license, go to college and other necessary things may now actually be able to move forward with their lives and obtain a sense of stability.
Overall, today's announcement is something to be celebrated. To many of us who have been wrapped up in the immigration debate for several years and whose cynicism tells us to be cautious, this may seem like a small step, but for those who have grown up American in every single way but on paper, this new policy has the potential to change their world.
There is still much to fight for when it comes to immigration reform, but that fight may have just become a little easier (or at least less risky) for some of the bravest warriors our cause has.
Time will tell how it all plays out.
Below is a collection of information and reactions from various media, activist and governmental sources on today's big news:
Government:
ICE Q&A
DHS Memo
Media:
Boston.com
NPR
CNN
WND
NewsMax
Politico
USA Today
Activists:
Reform Immigration for America
Define American?
Color Lines

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GETTING TO KNOW THE MEMPHIS IMMIGRATION COURT: 10 THINGS

By -
Image
The Memphis Immigration Court is not an independent, Article III, court of law. Rather, it is an administrative law court falling under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge , a component of the Executive Office forImmigration Review under the Department of Justice. The court in Memphis has jurisdiction over all non-detained removal proceedings originating in Arkansas, Tennessee and Northern Mississippi. As we're located in Arkansas, the vast majority of our clients facing removal end up in Memphis. Our cases involving detained immigrants will find themselves before one of the Louisiana courts and we sometimes have clients who find themselves before the Dallas or Kansas City immigration courts either because they are placed there by accident or they live in eastern Oklahoma or southwest Missouri. Regardless, Memphis is the general rule... 80 Monroe Avenue, Memphis, TN Photo courtesy of Google As such, it might be helpful to get to know the...
Read more

More New IJs in Memphis

By -
Image
The Memphis Immigration Court The Memphis Immigration Court has been busy during the pandemic. The court is in the process of expanding, adding additional space, more courtrooms, and new immigration judges. At the start of the pandemic in March 2020, the court only had four active IJs (two had recently retired, but two from Louisville were reassigned to Memphis). As of the writing of this post, the Memphis court's website lists eleven IJs. My court calendar confirms a twelfth IJ who I have included in this list. Rumors are there will be more. Here's who's new: Judge Alisha Campos : Judge Campos was appointed to the bench last October. She graduated with a B.A. from Arkansas State and a law degree from the University of Houston. Uniquely, Judge Campos has practiced both as a trial attorney for the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, and as a private immigration attorney. Now she's hit the trifecta when it comes to removal proceed...
Read more

New IJs in Memphis

By -
Image
Even though the non-detained immigration courts remain closed to hearings and other in-person services at this time, that does not mean the immigration courts are not making moves. For those following the Memphis Immigration Court in particular, it is common knowledge that a pair of retirements last year had been causing a considerable amount of confusion and delay well before COVID-19. The retirements were not totally unexpected as the immigration courts in general have struggled   to retain judges under this administration. Regardless, chaos and confusion are the natural consequences when a court that has been operating for several years with 4 immigration judges is suddenly reduced down to two. Recently, the Department of Justice has moved to re-staff and re-structure the Memphis court. The first change came shortly into the pandemic when Immigration Judge Renae M. Hansell was promoted to the position of Assistant Chief Immigration Judge (“ACIJ”) for the Memphis court...
Read more